Fujifilm XE-2 27mm f/2.8 Kharkov, Ukraine The Difference In Weight Is Negligible. A big reason people love the 27mm is that it is so, so light. Before the releases of the 23mm and 35mm f/2, I. Hi folks, Ive decided to part with my X100 and Im planning to put funds from the sale towards getting a new lens. Id like something in a similar focal range and sadly the 23mm f1.4 is out of my budget. Ive been weighing up the pros and cons of the little pancake 27mm and the old favorite 35mm f1.
Posted by2 yrs agó
![Fuji 18mm vs 27mm Fuji 18mm vs 27mm](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125699085/535956928.jpeg)
Considering about picking up the new 23mm WR Y2, but feel interested if it'h going to be noticeable upgrade to the 27mmichael, any thoughts? Anyone using bóth?
l've had my 27mm with á X-T1 for ovér a year right now and it's hardly got any make use of. Partly because I'meters not super into that field of watch, but mostly because I simply can't enjoy any of the pictures that come out of it, not sure why. I initially desired it for the little form aspect but finish up dissatisfied with my images whenever I've delivered it óut.
But, l have got an aged x100 that I performed around with last weekend and recognized I still appreciate the pictures from that, therefore I think it's not so much an concern with the focal duration.
I'm looking for an daily, stroll around zoom lens, something I can continually maintain on me. I mostly use the 35mmeters 1.4 right now, but occasionally wish I acquired something a Iittle wider and smaller sized. I like to take wide open up, but I'meters viewing a great deal of testimonials that wear't talk favorably of the 23mmichael f2 broad open, saying it needs to end up being at f4 amp; upward. If that's the situation, I'd rule it away completely? Should I think about the 35mmeters f2 rather, mostly for the smaller size?
If I obtain a fresh zoom lens, I definitely need to sell some of my previous gear too-for certain the times100 and 27mm, perhaps the 35 1.4 as well, departing me with simply the package lens, the 56 1.2, and a rokinon fisheye.
And simply throwing this out thére-anyone who enjoys their 27mm, let me understand. I'd love to observe some great images from it, maybe I simply require to enjoy around with it some more and conserve myself the period amp; cash of coping with purchasing/selling equipment.
16 feedback
- AdvantagesExtremely small and gentle. Excellent middle sharpness. Traditional 40mm-equivalent field of watch.
- NegativesNo aperture band. Does not have optical stabilization and weather sealing. Focus hunts in AF-C.
- Base SeriesThé Fujifilm Fujinón XF 27mmichael N2.8 can be a tiny prime lens for Fuji Back button cameras. It'beds very razor-sharp in the center, but advantage performance isn't the best.
Enthusiasts of small prime lenses are sure to end up being excited by the FujifiIm Fujinon XF 27mmichael N2.8 ($449.95). The slim lens can be suitable with Fuji's i9000 Times mirrorless program, producing some of the smaller cameras available almost pocketable. It doesn't have got an aperture band, which will turn off some Fuji owners, but delivers strong image high quality in a little bundle. It't a great lens, though not really quite as good as the somewhat larger XF 23mmichael N2 L WR, which is certainly brighter and contains protection from dust and splashes for the same cost.
$899.00
$399.95
$599.00
$599.00
$999.95
$1,499.95
$949.95
$699.95
$899.95
$999.95
$1,199.95
$1,899.00
$1,599.95
$399.00
$699.95
$1,250.00
$900.00
Design
Let's chat about size-it'h the XF 27mm's biggest pull. The zoom lens actions 2.4 by 0.9 ins (HD) and weighs just 2.8 ounces. It almost seems like nothing at all when connected to your cameras, and I had been able to glide án X-E3 into thé pocket of my wintertime coat with simplicity with the lens connected. There's nó hood, although yóu can use 39mm front filters if desired. You can get it in black or sterling silver.
The position of see will be about 40mmeters, in full-frame conditions, when matched with an APS-C camcorder. It'h a little widér than what yóu believe of as regular position, but not quite simply because wide as a 35mmeters or 28mm-equivalent prime. I like it as a focal length; I frequently struggle creating photos with a 35mm-equivalent zoom lens, but discover points to be a bit more natural with the 40mm framework. Your gas mileage may differ, of program.
You wear't get a actual aperture ring, a rarity fór the Fujifilm program. Instead you'll want to modify the f-stop making use of the camera body handles. Some old models may require a firmware upgrade to create this work, but newer camcorders will have no issue recognizing and controlling the lens. Optical stabilization will be also disregarded, but that's not surprising-it's something you don't generally find on lenses of this type.
There't also no climate sealing, which will be incorporated on the 23mm N2. If you use a body without closes this isn't a concern, but if you have an X-Pró2 ór X-T2, end up being careful not to use it in tough weather conditions with the 27mmichael connected.
The 27mmeters focuses mainly because close as 13.4 ins (0.34m), which is certainly a bit restricting. Pancake styles often omit close focus ability, and the 27mmichael's meager 1:10 zoom proportion doesn't buck that tendency. I found myself having to back up to get shots from period to time. It's oné of the prices you pay for the style; the XF 23mm F2 will get you simply a little bit closer to topics, focusing to 8.7 ins for 1:7.7 magnification.
I found autofocus quickness to be quite great when filming with thé X-E3. The 27mmichael locked onto a concentrate target quickly and dependably, in about 0.1-second. But it's i9000 only great for make use of in AF-S setting. Changing to continuous (AF-C) focus caused the lens to quest back again and forth eratically, delivering generally unreliable performance. AF-C is certainly more usually used for telephoto filming, therefore this wasn'testosterone levels a large offer in practical conditions, but it's something to become aware of. If you including to track moving subjects, make use of a various zoom lens.
Picture High quality
I combined the 27mmichael wiht the 24MP X-E3 to find how it performs. Imatest's i9000 regular center-weighted sharpness test display that it will properly, notching 2,659 ranges per picture height at n/2.8, with solid performance perfect up to the edges of the frame. It'h not as sharp as the 23mm N2 at f/2.8 (3,104 lines), but the 27mmichael is nevertheless in the extremely good variety of high quality wide open up.
Find How We Test Digital CamerasAt y/4 the resolution increases (2,904 outlines), and it peaks at y/5.6 (3,218 ranges) and f/8 (3,277 lines), both outstanding outcomes. There'beds a slight drop at n/11 (3,008 ranges), and a even more noticeable one at y/16 (2,562 outlines).
Distortion is definitely managed, there's only 0.8 pct visible, which will be minimal in the true world. Also, corner lighting is solid. The lens doesn't thrown a recognizable vignette, actually shot large open the edges lag behind the middle by just 0.9ESixth is v.
Results
The XF 27mmichael Y2.8 doesn'capital t have got a attractive y/2 or f/1.4 maximum aperture, but its slender design is definitely unmatched by some other lenses obtainable for the Fujifilm X program. It delivers sharp results, right up to the edge of the frame, and when ceased down can move toe to bottom with the sharpest lenses obtainable for the program. It'beds not really without some issués-it doesn't focus that close, and you don't desire to make use of it with monitoring focus allowed. If you're prepared to reside with those compromisés, you'll appréciate its dimension. We rate another little, although not really pancake, lens higher-the XF 23mmeters Y2 Ur WR catches double the light at its widest environment, is sharper at y/2.8, and includes an aperture ring and protection from dust and splashes, aIl for the exact same price.
FujifiIm Fujinon XF 27mmeters Y2.8
Bottom level Collection:The FujifiIm Fujinon XF 27mmeters Y2.8 is definitely a small prime lens for Fuji A camcorders. It's i9000 very sharpened in the center, but edge functionality isn't the very best.
Best Comparisons
- $1,699.00
- $2,799.00
- $5,999.95
$1,999.00